Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup docs on current pipelines #1058

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 18, 2023
Merged

Conversation

radtriste
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@radtriste radtriste marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2023 07:02
docs/current_pipelines.md Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/current_pipelines.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/current_pipelines.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mareknovotny
Copy link
Contributor

it looks ok, just we should not show internal URL hosts ;)

@radtriste
Copy link
Contributor Author

it looks ok, just we should not show internal URL hosts ;)

Well, what does it change from PR checks links ?

@mareknovotny
Copy link
Contributor

probably nothing ;)

@radtriste
Copy link
Contributor Author

Feel free to merge that one :)

2) Launch `main/tools/update-quarkus-all` job with
* [Drools](https://eng-jenkins-csb-business-automation.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/KIE/job/drools/job/main/job/tools/job/update-quarkus-all/)
* [Kogito](https://eng-jenkins-csb-business-automation.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/KIE/job/kogito/job/main/job/tools/job/update-quarkus-all/)
* [OptaPlanner](https://eng-jenkins-csb-business-automation.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/KIE/job/optaplanner/job/main/job/tools/job/update-quarkus-all/)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rgdoliveira @ricardozanini @mareknovotny I guess this needs to be migrated to apache if we want to reference it here? This probably souldn't be merged with these links

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i guess the update should go into kiegroup repo first and if needed @jstastny-cz can take it and customize it for ASF how it was done or just ignore it as ASF pipeline can be evolving into something else. @domhanak

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mareknovotny thank you, I think that make sense. @radtriste mind opening on kiegroup or should I take care of it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR was originally opened on kiegroup ...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I won't have time to do that backporting, so please do it :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No worries I ll handle it @radtriste thanks you

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've adjusted URL references to apache. Please check.

Copy link
Contributor

@jstastny-cz jstastny-cz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants